Marcoleta iginiit na spliced video ang ipinakita ni NBI Melvin Matibag sa house hearing

And I can say that the video was spliced and edit it out. Habang pinapanood po natin ang mga video ni BP Sarah, ang pangulo ay nananatiling buhay na buhay. Alive and kicking. To me and to the buo ay seryoso po ang threat sa buhay po ng ating pangulo. Ito pong video na to ay inauthenticate mismo ng NBI just for the record.

 Lumalabas po na lahat po yan ay authentic totoo. Wala pong AI. Me and my wife were under attack sa social media starting nung Monday until until today. Congressman Paulo Marcoleta is recognized. >> Thank you sa napakabait kong ninang DS Gar at sa ating Madam Chair. Ah just a manifestation on the the video that was played earlier. I was I’m referring to the video which is the bone of contention uh the very basis of how of why uh there was a an alleged threat to the life of the president.

 Yun pong nagsasalita si Vice President Sarah Duterte doon sa isang kwarto na madilim. Opo. And uh I have a copy of a more complete video and I can say that the video was spliced and edited out. Meron pong mga tanong doon that to vice president to the vice president response. If I may read, Madam Chair, ito po yyung tinanong ng isang vlogger by the name of Princess Maui regarding Project Romanov.

Baka po totoo yung sinasabi nila or naririnig namin na may operation Romanov sa inyo na balak kayong ubusin. Bago po niya binanggit yun ni Sar Duterte, meron pong nagtanong sa kanya na vlogger about the it was a concern about the threat on her life. So ang project Nomalob Romanob ay hindi talaga para magplano na sa buhay ng ating pangulo kundi initially para para ubusin ang mga Duterte.

base dito saong ni Princess Maui and uh I have a copy of the more complete video madam chair if uh if you so desire to to be furnished the copy of the video and if I may add madam chair the statements made by VP Sarah Duterte is mere political hyperboly rather than a true threat Philippine courts have historically protected with harsh even offensive political rhetoric when it lacks a specific imminent call to lawless action.

Impeachment cannot rest on rhetorical severity alone. Impeacment requires a disciplined inquiry into proof, intent, context, and official misuse of power. The statement was conditional on her own alleged killing was later explained as an expression of concern for her security and remains the subject of of an unresolved criminal and investigative process.

 Sinabi nga po ni VP Inday Sarah na siya mismo ang nagsabi that the remark was a plan without flesh and that the condition was her own death first based on the Aljazira uh interview dated 26 of November 2024. Unless the house can prove that the vice president made a serious operational instruction to an identifiable person or use her office to advance such plan, the allegation is better treated as a matter for criminal investigation and political censure not as a self-executing basis for removal from office.

 And if I may this manifestation. Madam chair based on the fourth verified complaint itself the allegation arises from a statement made during a press briefing framed as a conditional and dependent on a hypothetical scenario. With your respect, this raises a threshold issue. At this stage the committee is not determining criminal liability.

 It is determining whether the complaint alleges sufficient grounds based on its contents. A statement standing alone without an act, without collaboration and without evidence of execution remains an allegation. And madam chair, hagaang pinapanood po natin ang mga video ni BP Sarah, ang pangulo ay nananatiling buhay na buhay alive and kicking at nakakapag-jumping jacks pa.

So buhay na buhay po ang ating pangulo at malusog. Maraming salamat po. Manifestation is noted. The honorable Joel. Thank you madam chair. >> Is this quick? >> Yes, very quick. Just a quick manifestation. Madam chair ah hindi po totoo na splice yung kanyang binabanggit kanina na video dahil ito pong video na to ay inauthenticate mismo ng NBI just for the record.

Madam Share ah siguro yung portion lamang na may ah relevant dito po sa topic natin yun lamang po dahil kung pakikita ko po yung buong video ay ah medyo magtatagal na po tayo at yun po madam >> we know the manifestation of the honorable madam chair >> you want to speak some more opo meron po kasing video na mas kumpleto At hindi naman po katagalan yung mga preceding portions no.

 If I may interrupt honorable Mark Coleta, we are referring to the investigation report of the NBI and not to any other videos outside. Opo. Sinasabi ko na po circumstances that led to VP response on that particular video. >> We note your manifestation but nevertheless, we are bound by the rules to stick to what was submitted to us by the NBI.

>> Madam chair, this are being submitted not as videos which surround outside. This are being submitted as videos part of the investigation of the National Bureau of Investigation and we cannot go beyond that. The honorable Janet Gen the one who yielded the time in favor of honorable Marcoletta.

 Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Um, before I go to my line of questioning, linawin lang po natin. Pag sinabi pong splice ay pinutol, dinugtong at nagkaibang meaning. Do I get that right, Madam Chair? Maybe we should ask the National Bureau of Investigation. Well, uh sabi nga namin part ng submission namin that is authenticated.

It was not splice. It was Pag sinabi pong splice, parang may ni-replace ka diyan eh. it is not spliced dahil hindi mo hindi mo pinutol at dinugtong para magkaibang meaning. And pwede naman po na kung time na nakita naman po eh napanood niyo pong video. And in fact doon po sa counter yyung sinasabi po ni Congressman Marcoleta was already been discussed on the counterbit na sinubmit po ni Vice President Duterte doon po sa doon po sa kaso sa DOJ.

 Kaya po na-rece na po yang mga issue na yan. O madam chair can the NBI confirm magkaiba po yung may puputulin ka at idudugtong para magkaroon ng ibang meaning vis a vis na kumuha ka sa specific portion ng video na merong threat. Tama po ba? Kinuha po namin yung specific na portion na nagsasabi nung threat. Okay, let me move forward.

 Madam Chair, nasabi rin po kanina ng ating kagalang-galang na colleague si Honorable Marcoleta na tila nagkaroon ng plano para ubusin ang pamilyang Duterte. Can we ask the NBI if there indeed was such a plan? >> Si RD Lot will answer that because that was part of the investigation na nagsabi na meron nga pong OPL Romanop. So Ardolotok >> madam cholotok is recognized.

>> Madam chair may I just react to to my ninang regarding the answer of the NBI please. Opo. Kasi sinabi ko rin po edited out so there could be omissions na hindi na-include po sa video. So >> we note we note your additional manifestation. >> Thank you po. >> Yes ma’am. You may proceed. Thank you, madam chair.

Actually, yung sinasabi ko po kanina, one of the reasons kung bakit nag-issue ho kami ng sa ating visidente ay para ho imbestigahan yung alleged threat naman sa kanyang person. Ah unfortunately, nung hindi ho nag-appear ang ating visidente, wala ho kaming ah information whatsoever na pwedeng pagsimulan ng aming imbestigasyon.

 Yun po yung dahilan. Madam Chair, >> so you confirmed that you intend to investigate threat against the vice president. However, she did not appear when she was invited to the NBI. >> Yes, ma’am. That’s that’s part of our primary jurisdiction and okay DS Janet Gar. Yeah. Um, Madam Chair, baka pwedeng kumustahin ko muna si Director Melvin Matibag.

 Kumusta po kayo? Medyo mainit lang po. Nasira yata yung aircon niyo eh. Um ah nakakatulog naman po kayo. Well ah okay naman po except that siguro if you’re repairing doon sa social media. We we just noticed that uh me and my wife were under attack sa social media starting nung Monday until until today. So baka kaya ka naiinitan.

Hindi naman po. Relax lang po tayo. Pero ma, you can confirm to this honorable committee na lahat po ng impormasyon na inyong binibigay at lahat po ng mga dokumentong inyong binibigay ay dumaan sa tamang pagve-vet or correct vetting. And wala po ditong pekeng dokumento. Unang-una po nung dumating ako, nandiyan na naman po lahat ng dokumento na yan.

It is already submitted to the Department of Justice. At po lahat authenticated. Wala po kaming pinalitan. Wala po kaming dinagdag. Ang nadagdag lang po rito ay yung aking uh order na magkaroon ng continuing investigation because to me and to the bureau ay seryoso po ang threat sa buhay po ng ating pangulo. Madam chair, napakarami po ng videos na pliny.

 Hindi ko alam kung meron pang ibang mga videos in the possession of the National Bureau of Investigation. Tanong ko lang po sa NBI, talaga bang lahat ng videos kanina ay totoo? Wala po bang AI doon? Yes po, totoo po yan. Ayan po ay valid authenticated lahatlahat po ng ipinasa namin sa komite pong ito. Madam chair doon ko kasi sa video meron tayong mga nakikitang galit na galit ang BC presidente.

 yung bang parang gigil na gigil no na parang hindi siya makapagsalita ng diretso dahil sa galit. Hindi po ba ito eh manipulado o AI? Ah nag-validate po yung aming mga technical personalities diyan sa NBI at lumalabas po na lahat po yan ay authentic totoo. Wala pong AI. Gaya po ng sinabi kanina ni Agent Kalilong na lahat po yan ay totoo.

Sa inyo po bangensya pangkaraniwan ba itong behavior ng isang um highly positioned government official? Well, I’m not an expert on the behavior of a person pero sabi ko nga meron kaming behavioral science department na aming kinonsulta at ah kataka-taka po na ganyan yyung behavior. At siguro naman po if we go back to our history na mga dati na ring nanungkulan ng parehas na posisyon eh hindi naman po yata nagkaroon ng ganyan po na pangyayari.

 My last question madam cheer kasi kani-kanina may nagsabi it was a political hyperbolet no parang joke lang. Hindi po ba? Matanong lang ‘yung NBI, kapag ikaw ay isang pasahero at nagbigay ka ng bump joke, sumakay ka ng eroplano at sinabi mong bobombahin ko ito o may dala akong bomba, is it being considered as very serious by the NBI or other government agencies or pwede mong sabihin joke lang po? >> Well, hindi lang po sa Pilipinas that is already an internationally accepted law.

At nasa batas na po ‘yan na sinabi na ‘yung biro na ‘yan eh hindi considered the biro but will be always be considered as a serious threat po. Yeah. >> Last comment madam chair. Kunyari po, kunyari no kunyari lang po ako’y nagsalita at sinabi ko, “Ipapapatay ko ang isang tao versus ng salita ko, ipapapatay ko yung isang tao.

” May pagkakaiba po ba yun or wala? From the point of view of law enforcement, ay susundan po namin parehas yan kasi not how you said it but it will be the gravity based on the investigation. Ah pagsasama-samahin po yan, it will be the compluence of events. Ano pa ba yung mga naging aktion na yan? If it’s specifically directed to a person at saka po yung will who will be the beneficiary at ano yung magiging ah benepisyo pa po other than sa monetary na maaring mangyari sayo.

>> Thank you very much madam chair. Just to manifest bilang mga government officials, minsan may mga bagay-bagay na yung ating emosyon ay pwedeng pumutok. However, ating posisyon ay ang pagkontrol, ang pag-decipher, ang pag-discern. Dahil minsan kapag tayo ay palaging galit at lahat ng ating mga ipapahayag ay may kasamang galit, hindi maliliwanagan yung mga bagay-bagay na ating sasabihin.

 And oftentimes, when we mention the statements in the heat of our emotions, this can cause destabilization. Lalo’talo na kapag ikaw ay naghahawak ng posisyon kagaya ng BC presidente o bilang pangalawang pangulo. In other words, madam chair, allow me to manifest that the issues on anger on the minor on statements that cannot be acceptable as members of highly ranking positions.

 Lahat po ng mga ito madam chair ay dapat matingnan at dapat mabusisi kasi hindi po pwedeng sabihin natin na joke lang. Thank you very much madamer. Thank you very much. Thank you. DS Gar